Does intensive follow-up increase days alive and well out of hospital in heart failure?

151 Figure 1Day after discharge from hospitalDid you feel well today?Please write yes or no.Weight, kg123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930 151 Table 1Baseline characteristicsBaseline characteristicsStandard Follow-UpN=9Intensive Follow-UpN=17Age (years)78 [69,81]74 [65,82]Gender [number of females (%)] 2 (22%)7 (41%)Rockwood Frailty Score (2 weeks pre admission) 3 [3,5]5 [3,5]Left Ventricular Systolic Function (%)Preserved 34%Mildly impaired 11%Moderately impaired 33%Severely impaired 22%Preserved 35%Mildly impaired 12%Moderately impaired 18%Severely impaired 35%NTproBNP ng/L4772 [2883,4859]9 88 [4333,14876]eGFR on discharge, ml/min/1.73m246 [35,63]51 [30,82]Comorbidity Number (in addition to HF)3 [2,4]5 [3,6]SBP, mmHg108 [106,111]110 [103,120]Number of people known COVID positive (%)0%6%Descriptive statistics are expressed as Median [IQR] or N (%).Abbreviations: eGFR: Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate, HF: Heart failure, IQR: Inter-Quartile Range, NTproBNP: N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide, SBP: Systolic Blood Pressure. 151 Table 2Effectiveness of intensive follow-upStandard Follow-UpIntensive Follow-UpDays alive and well out of hospital12 [8,25]22 [15,28]Days with weight recorded27 [14,30]27 [7,30]ACEi, ARB, or entresto (%)6 (67%)14 (82%)Beta-Blocker (%)8 (89%)16 (94%)% max. dose of Beta-Blocker 44 [25,53]50 [34,100]MRA%5 (56%)9 (53%)Dose of MRA, mg25 [25,25]25 [25, 25]SGLT2 inhibitor (on Dapaglifozin or empaglifozin) (%)5 (56%)14 (82%)Total number of Disease Modifying Agents (max 4)3 [2,4]3 [3,4]Descriptive statistics are expressed as Median [IQR] or N (%).Abbreviations: ACEi: Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor, ARB: Angiotensin Receptor Blocker, IQR: Inter-Quartile Range, MRA: Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, SGLT2 inhibitors: Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors.Conflict of InterestNone

The Associations of Antihypertensive Medications, Steroids, Beta Blockers, Statins and Comorbidities with COVID-19 Outcomes in Patients with and without Chronic Kidney Disease: A Retrospective Study

(1) Background: Data on COVID-19 outcomes and disease course as a function of different medications used to treat cardiovascular disease and chronic kidney disease (CKD), as well as the presence of different comorbidities in primarily Black cohorts, are lacking. (2) Methods: We conducted a retrospective medical chart review on 327 patients (62.6% Black race) who were admitted to the Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI. Group differences (CKD vs. non-CKD) were compared using the Pearson χ2 test. We conducted univariate and multivariate regression analyses for factors contributing to death during hospitalization due to COVID-19 (primary outcome) and ICU admission (secondary outcome), adjusting for age, sex, different medications, and comorbidities. A sub-analysis was also completed for CKD patients. (3) Results: In the fully adjusted model, a protective effect of ACEi alone, but not in combination with ARB or CCB, for ICU admission was found (OR = 0.400, 95% CI [0.183–0.874]). Heart failure was significantly associated with the primary outcome (OR = 4.088, 95% CI [1.1661–14.387]), as was COPD (OR = 3.747, 95% CI [1.591–8.828]). (4) Conclusions: Therapeutic strategies for cardiovascular disease and CKD in the milieu of different comorbidities may need to be tailored more prudently for individuals with COVID-19, especially Black individuals. [ FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of COVID is the property of MDPI and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)

RAAS inhibition and beyond-cardiovascular medications in patients at risk of or affected by COVID-19.

The COVID-19 pandemic led to an enormous burden on healthcare systems worldwide. Causal therapy is still in its infancy. Contrary to initial views that the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi)/angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) may increase the risk for a deleterious disease course, it has been shown that these agents may actually be beneficial for patients affected by COVID-19. In this article, we provide an overview of the three most commonly used classes of drugs in cardiovascular disease (ACEi/ARB, statins, beta-blockers) and their potential role in COVID-19 therapy. More results from randomized clinical trials are necessary to identify patients that can benefit most from the use of the respective drugs.

An audit comparing management of patients with HFrEF at a DGH before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

This audit compared the management of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) admitted to a district general hospital (DGH) during comparative eight month periods before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. The periods studied were from 1st February 2019 to 30th September 2019 and between the same dates in 2020. We investigated differences in mortality and patient characteristics (age, gender and new or prior diagnosis). For patients who survived to discharge and who were not referred to palliative care, we also investigated whether there were differences in rates of echocardiography and prescription of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor antagonists and beta blockers. We found that the number of cases was lower during the pandemic and there was a lower mortality rate that was not statistically significant. There was a higher proportion of new cases (odds ratio [OR] 2.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.24 to 3.94, p=0.008) and of female patients (OR 2.03, 95%CI 1.14 to 3.61, p=0.019). For survivors, there was a non-significant decrease in prescription rates for ACE inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor antagonists (81.6% vs. 71.4%, p=0.137) that was not seen for beta blockers. The length of stay was increased and there was also an increase in the interval between admission and echocardiography in patients who were newly diagnosed. Regardless of time period, the time before echocardiography was significantly associated with length of stay.

Infection prevention and control programme and COVID-19 measures: Effects on hospital-acquired infections in patients with cirrhosis.

Background & Aims: Bacterial infections affect survival of patients with cirrhosis. Hospital-acquired bacterial infections present a growing healthcare problem because of the increasing prevalence of multidrug-resistant organisms. This study aimed to investigate the impact of an infection prevention and control programme and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) measures on the incidence of hospital-acquired infections and a set of secondary outcomes, including the prevalence of multidrug-resistant organisms, empiric antibiotic treatment failure, and development of septic states in patients with cirrhosis. Methods: The infection prevention and control programme was a complex strategy based on antimicrobial stewardship and the reduction of patient's exposure to risk factors. The COVID-19 measures presented further behavioural and hygiene restrictions imposed by the Hospital and Health Italian Sanitary System recommendations. We performed a combined retrospective and prospective study in which we compared the impact of extra measures against the hospital standard. Results: We analysed data from 941 patients. The infection prevention and control programme was associated with a reduction in the incidence of hospital-acquired infections (17 vs. 8.9%, p <0.01). No further reduction was present after the COVID-19 measures had been imposed. The impact of the infection prevention and control programme remained significant even after controlling for the effects of confounding variables (odds ratio 0.44, 95% CI 0.26-0.73, p = 0.002). Furthermore, the adoption of the programme reduced the prevalence of multidrug-resistant organisms and decreased rates of empiric antibiotic treatment failure and the development of septic states. Conclusions: The infection prevention and control programme decreased the incidence of hospital-acquired infections by nearly 50%. Furthermore, the programme also reduced the prevalence of most of the secondary outcomes. Based on the results of this study, we encourage other liver centres to adopt infection prevention and control programmes. Impact and implications: Infections are a life-threatening problem for patients with liver cirrhosis. Moreover, hospital-acquired infections are even more alarming owing to the high prevalence of multidrug-resistant bacteria. This study analysed a large cohort of hospitalised patients with cirrhosis from three different periods. Unlike in the first period, an infection prevention programme was applied in the second period, reducing the number of hospital-acquired infections and containing multidrug-resistant bacteria. In the third period, we imposed even more stringent measures to minimise the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak. However, these measures did not result in a further reduction in hospital-acquired infections.

Beta-blockers in post-acute myocardial infarction patients: Drug prescription patterns from 2018 to Italy's first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Background: Major guidelines recommend the initiation of a beta-blocker therapy after an acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We aimed to map the treatment pathway of beta-blockers for AMI survivors during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic in Italy and to investigate predictors for treatment non-initiation. Methods: Healthcare utilization databases of Lombardy Region were investigated. Subjects aged ≥18 years who were hospitalised with AMI in the period February-March-April of 2018, 2019, and 2020 were included, and followed for 30 days from the discharge date, to investigate whether they presented a first prescription of beta-blockers. A multivariate logistic model was performed to evaluate the effect of several covariates on the probability of not receiving a post-AMI beta-blocker therapy. Results: The cohorts comprised 2259, 2383, and 1932 individuals who were hospitalised with AMI in the 3-month period in 2018, 2019, and 2020, respectively. Overall in 2020, about 58-60% of individuals with AMI received a prescription of beta-blockers within 1 month after the discharge. A continuous decreasing trend over time was observed. Men were 30% more likely to start the treatment than women, increasing age was associated with significant increasing probability of not receiving a post-infarction beta-blocker therapy, while having received an antihypertensive or lipid-lowering treatment, or having been hospitalized for heart failure prior to the AMI hospitalization reduced the likelihood of not being treated with beta-blockers. Conclusion: The initiation of beta-blocker treatment after AMI remains an under-prescribed practice, that does not seem to have been further affected by the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Insight into appropriate medication prescribing for elderly in the COVID-19 era.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) complicates clinical management in elderly population. There is an additional need to properly treat and monitor elderly COVID-19 patients. This paper discusses the inappropriate medication prescribing in the elderly and suggests an updated valid assessment tool considering COVID-19 and its treatment.

Comparative efficacy of ivabradine and beta-blockers in the treatment of tachycardia in patients after COVID-19.

Aim. To assess the changes of heart rate (HR), exercise tolerance and quality of life in patients after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) during treatment with ivabradine monotherapy or in combination with beta-blockers (BB) compared with BB monotherapy. Material and methods. This randomized comparative study included 90 patients discharged from a university hospital after an acute COVID-19. The main group (n=60) received, in addition to standard therapy, ivabradine monotherapy or in combination with BB, while the control one (n=30) — standard therapy in combination with BB. The follow-up period lasted 24 weeks. Statistical processing was performed using the STATISTICA 8.0 program. The level of statistical significance was p<0,05. Results. There was a significant decrease in heart rate, an increase in physical activity, as well as an improvement in the quality of life in both groups. In the ivabradine group, significantly lower heart rates (71,2±4,1 vs 73,9±5,1 bpm (p=0,015)), significantly higher increase in physical activity (80 (60;135) vs 65 m (40;100) (p=0,017)) and quality of life (35 (27;45) vs 30 (26;36) points (p=0,03)) was revealed. Conclusion. It has been shown that ivabradine and beta-blockers can be used in post-COVID-19 tachycardia. Ivabradine monotherapy or in combination with beta-blockers causes a more pronounced decrease in heart rate compared to beta-blocker monotherapy, accompanied by a significant improvement in exercise tolerance and quality of life in this category of patients. (English) [ FROM AUTHOR] Цель. Оценить динамику частоты сердечных сокращений (ЧСС), толерантности к физической нагрузке и качества жизни у пациентов, перенесших новую коронавирусную инфекцию (COVID-19, COronaVIrus Disease 2019), на фоне лечения ивабрадином в монотерапии или в комбинации с бета-адреноблокаторами (БАБ) по сравнению с монотерапией БАБ. Материал и методы. В рандомизированное сравнительное исследование включены 90 пациентов, выписанных из университетской клиники после острого периода COVID-19. Основная группа (n=60) получала в дополнение к стандартной терапии ивабрадин в монотерапии или в сочетании с БАБ;контрольная (n=30) — стандартную терапию в сочетании с БАБ. Срок наблюдения — 24 нед. При статистической обработке использовали программу STATISTICA 8.0. Уровень статистической значимости — р<0,05. Результаты. На фоне проводимого лечения отмечено достоверное снижение ЧСС, прирост физической активности, а также улучшение качества жизни в обеих группах. В группе ивабрадина достигнуты достоверно более низкие показатели ЧСС: 71,2±4,1 по сравнению с 73,9±5,1 уд./мин (р=0,015), выявлено достоверное увеличение физической активности: 80 (60;135) vs 65 м (40;100) (р=0,017), а также достоверно более высокий прирост качества жизни: 35 (27;45) vs 30 (26;36) баллов (р=0,03). Заключение. Показано, что ивабрадин и БАБ могут использоваться для коррекции постковидной тахикардии, причем ивабрадин в монотерапии или в комбинации с БАБ по сравнению с монотерапией БАБ вызывает более выраженное снижение ЧСС, сопровождающееся достоверно более значимым улучшением переносимости физической нагрузки и качества жизни данной категории пациентов. (Russian) [ FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Cardiovascular Therapy & Prevention is the property of Silicea-Poligraf LLC and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)

Anti-ischemic therapy in patients with COVID-19 and acute coronary syndrome

Introduction. Since the end of 2019, the pandemic caused by SARS-CoV2 has affected hundreds of millions of people, and the number of indirectly affected is many times higher. In addition to directly affecting lung tissue, the coronavirus infection predisposes patients to thrombotic events responsible for the occurrence of cardiovascular complications. The aim of our study was to observe patients with COVID-19 and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and to evaluate the efficacy of anti-ischemic therapy with beta-blockers, molsidomine and trimetazidine.

Effects of ß-Blockers on the Sympathetic and Cytokines Storms in Covid-19.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a causative virus in the development of coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) pandemic. Respiratory manifestations of SARS-CoV-2 infection such as acute lung injury (ALI) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) leads to hypoxia, oxidative stress, and sympatho-activation and in severe cases leads to sympathetic storm (SS). On the other hand, an exaggerated immune response to the SARS-CoV-2 invasion may lead to uncontrolled release of pro-inflammatory cytokine development of cytokine storm (CS). In Covid-19, there are interactive interactions between CS and SS in the development of multi-organ failure (MOF). Interestingly, cutting the bridge between CS and SS by anti-inflammatory and anti-adrenergic agents may mitigate complications that are induced by SARS-CoV-2 infection in severely affected Covid-19 patients. The potential mechanisms of SS in Covid-19 are through different pathways such as hypoxia, which activate the central sympathetic center through carotid bodies chemosensory input and induced pro-inflammatory cytokines, which cross the blood-brain barrier and activation of the sympathetic center. ß2-receptors signaling pathway play a crucial role in the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, macrophage activation, and B-cells for the production of antibodies with inflammation exacerbation. ß-blockers have anti-inflammatory effects through reduction release of pro-inflammatory cytokines with inhibition of NF-κB. In conclusion, ß-blockers interrupt this interaction through inhibition of several mediators of CS and SS with prevention development of neural-cytokine loop in SARS-CoV-2 infection. Evidence from this study triggers an idea for future prospective studies to confirm the potential role of ß-blockers in the management of Covid-19.

Hypertension and COVID-19: Updates from the era of vaccines and variants.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the pathogen responsible for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been a major cause of morbidity and mortality globally. Older age, and the presence of certain components of metabolic syndrome, including hypertension have been associated with increased risk for severe disease and death in COVID-19 patients. The role of antihypertensive agents in the pathogenesis of COVID-19 has been extensively studied since the onset of the pandemic. This review discusses the potential pathophysiologic interactions between hypertension and COVID-19 and provides an up-to-date information on the implications of newly emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants, and vaccines on patients with hypertension.

SARS-COV-2 in Type 2 Diabetic Patients: Possible Roles of Exercise Training as a Medicine.

SARS-COV-2 is the novel type of beta coronavirus that was first evolved in December 2019 in Wuhan, China. People with type 2 diabetes are the most vulnerable group to SARS-COV-2 and its associated complications. Many factors such as medication, pathophysiologic-induced compensatory mechanisms, and alterations in protein expression and immune system function can all contribute to severe outcomes in diabetics. In this review article, we first described the possible mechanisms of increased risk and more severe complications rate of SARS-COV-2 in diabetic patients. Secondly, we discussed the crucial role of exercise in diabetic patients in balancing the RAS system (ACE2/ACE). Finally, we examine the possible roles of acute and chronic exercise in reducing SARS-COV-2 severe outcomes in people with diabetes in accordance with the latest evidence. We concluded that regular exercise (especially moderate-intensity exercise) can play a role in immune- enhancing, anti-inflammatory, and anti-oxidant activities and can balance the ACE2/ACE ratio (decreasing ANG2 levels) in diabetic subjects.

Association between tachyarrhythmia and mortality in a cohort of critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular involvement manifesting as arrhythmias has been confirmed in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), so we aimed to explore the association between primary tachyarrhythmia and death in critically ill patients with COVID-19 in this retrospective study. METHODS: A total of 79 critically ill patients with COVID-19 were included. Demographic characteristics, clinical data (past history, vital signs, therapeutic management, and outcomes), and results of laboratory findings and cardiac investigations were collected. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 23.0 software (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). RESULTS: The median age was 65±12 years, and 53 patients (67%) were male. A total of 57 (72%) patients died, and compared with survivors, these patients were older and had significantly higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score and fewer lymphocytes as well as higher heart rate (P<0.05). Autopsy findings did not suggest severe myocarditis. A total of 19 (24%) patients had tachyarrhythmias, including 10 (13%) with atrial fibrillation (AF) and 9 (11%) with ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation. The incidence of tachyarrhythmias in non-survivor was much higher than in survivors (P=0.04). In a Cox regression model, older patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VTAs) age were at a higher risk of death, with hazard ratio (HR) of 3.302 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.524-7.154, P=0.002] and 1.045 (95% CI, 1.020-1.071, P=0.000), respectively. The use of beta-blockers [HR, 0.219 (95% CI, 0.066-0.722); P=0.013] was associated with a lower risk of death. CONCLUSIONS: Critically ill patients with COVID-19 had a poor prognosis. VTA and older age were independent prognostic factors of death. Beta-blockers might be an effective therapy to improve survival.

Factors associated with survival in older patients affected by COVID-19: A retrospective cohort study.

AIM: Mortality is high in Coronavirus disease 2019 patients with pre-existing comorbidities and advanced age. Associated complications have added to the negative prognosis. Nevertheless, many have fully recovered, even among the most fragile. Factors associated with their survival was investigated. METHODS: Retrospective study of patients aged ≥90 years admitted for COVID-19 to the Internal Medicine wards of two hospitals in Lombardy, Italy. RESULTS: Among 34 patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia, 33 (97.1%) had respiratory failure. Eighteen patients (52.9%) survived and 16 (47.1%) died during hospital stay. Survivors compared to deceased had a significantly longer hospitalization (19 vs. 10 days respectively; p = 0.02), a better PaO2:FiO2 ratio (241 vs. 171 respectively; p = 0.003), higher lymphocyte counts (p = 0.01) and lower serum LDH levels (p < 0.001) at admission. At multivariate analysis only higher PaO2:FiO2 was associated with survival (OR 1.06 [95%CI 1.0-1.03]; p = 0.02). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a significant difference in event-free survival between patients treated or not with LMWH (p < 0.0001) and between those treated or not with beta-blockers (p = 0.008). Cox regression, performed in the subgroup of patients who received LMWH, did not show significant difference for sex (HR 2.7 [95% CI 0.53-14.3], p = 0.23), CCI (HR 0.7 [95% CI 0.37-1.45], p = 0.38), PaO2:FiO2 ratio (HR 0.98 [95% CI 0.97-1.0], p = 0.07), corticosteroid therapy (HR 0.99 [95% CI 0.22-4.5], p = 0.99) and beta-blocker therapy (HR 2.8 [95% CI 0.56-14,7], p = 0.21). CONCLUSIONS: Despite higher mortality in elderly, treatment with LMWH and betablockers might be associated with better survival. Dedicated studies are required to confirm our result.

Can Beta-2-Adrenergic Pathway Be a New Target to Combat SARS-CoV-2 Hyperinflammatory Syndrome?-Lessons Learned From Cancer.

SARS-CoV-2 infection is a new threat to global public health in the 21st century (2020), which has now rapidly spread around the globe causing severe pneumonia often linked to Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) and hyperinflammatory syndrome. SARS-CoV-2 is highly contagious through saliva droplets. The structural analysis suggests that the virus enters human cells through the ligation of the spike protein to angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2). The progression of Covid-19 has been divided into three main stages: stage I-viral response, stage II-pulmonary phase, and stage III-hyperinflammation phase. Once the patients enter stage III, it will likely need ventilation and it becomes difficult to manage. Thus, it will be of paramount importance to find therapies to prevent or slow down the progression of the disease toward stage III. The key event leading to hyperinflammation seems to be the activation of Th-17 immunity response and Cytokine storm. B2-adrenergic receptors (B2ARs) are expressed on airways and on all the immune cells such as macrophages, dendritic cells, B and T lymphocytes. Blocking (B2AR) has been proven, also in clinical settings, to reduce Th-17 response and negatively modulate inflammatory cytokines including IL-6 while increasing IFNγ. Non-selective beta-blockers are currently used to treat several diseases and have been proven to reduce stress-induced inflammation and reduce anxiety. For these reasons, we speculate that targeting B2AR in the early phase of Covid-19 might be beneficial to prevent hyperinflammation.